About the Founder
Adv. Viren Sibal
Founder & Advocate · Additional Public Prosecutor, UT Chandigarh
Profile
A third-generation advocate with over nine years of experience in legal practice, Advocate Viren Sibal combines a contemporary, pragmatic approach to litigation with the enduring values of the legal profession. Drawing upon his experience across constitutional courts and various judicial and quasi-judicial forums, his practice is grounded in meticulous preparation, sound legal reasoning and effective advocacy.
With professional experience gained through association with established chambers and engagement with senior advocates, he brings a considered perspective to the preparation and conduct of legal proceedings. His approach is informed by the belief that effective representation rests not only on legal acumen and strategic thinking, but also on candour, professional responsibility and a clear understanding of the client’s interests.
The practice also encompasses a range of institutional and panel engagements, reflecting a broad spectrum of professional responsibilities across the legal landscape. Advocate Viren Sibal serves as Additional Public Prosecutor for the Union Territory of Chandigarh, representing the State in criminal proceedings before the Punjab and Haryana High Court. In addition, he is associated as Panel Counsel with several reputed institutions and organisations, including leading hospitals and healthcare institutions, established universities and educational bodies, prominent real estate developers and corporate entities. These engagements involve representing institutional interests before various judicial and quasi-judicial forums, advising on legal and regulatory matters, and conducting litigation across diverse areas of law.
At the Office of Viren Sibal, the endeavour is to provide honest, well-reasoned and practical legal advice, while approaching every matter with diligence, integrity and due regard for the responsibilities entrusted.
Latest cases
19 Aug 2026· Judgment
P&H High Court quashes proclaimed person order and Section 174-A IPC FIR after acquittal
Viren Sibal and Tisha Kalra appeared for the petitioners, who had been declared proclaimed persons in an Environment Protection Act complaint later ending in their acquittal. Relying on Daljit Singh v. State of Haryana, the Court held that once the main complaint ends in acquittal, continuing the Section 174-A IPC proceedings serves no useful purpose, and quashed the 2019 order and the FIR.
4 Jul 2026· Judgment
P&H High Court upholds trial court decision on additional evidence under S. 311 CrPC
The office appeared for the respondent before the Punjab & Haryana High Court. The Court declined to interfere with the trial court allowing additional evidence, observing that Section 311 CrPC / 348 BNSS empowers courts to admit evidence necessary for a just adjudication.
Read more25 Jun 2026· Order
Supreme Court grants interim protection in second anticipatory bail petition
Appeared for the petitioner before the Supreme Court, challenging the High Court’s dismissal of a second anticipatory bail petition. Issuing notice, the Court directed that no coercive steps be taken against the petitioner, subject to cooperation with the investigation.
Read more4 Jun 2026· Judgment
P&H High Court upholds eviction on ground of bona fide requirement
The High Court upheld the eviction of a tenant from commercial premises in Ludhiana, recognising the landlord’s son’s genuine need to establish an independent business, and reaffirming that “own use” extends to dependent family members.
Read more12 May 2026· Appearance
Challenge to arrest under PMLA argued before the P&H High Court
The office appeared before the Division Bench in a petition challenging an arrest and remand by the Directorate of Enforcement, questioning the invocation of PMLA on the basis of FEMA proceedings and the safeguards under Article 21.
Read more11 Mar 2026· Judgment
P&H High Court directs mediation in cheque bounce cases under the NI Act
Representing the respondent, the office assisted the Court on the interplay between the Negotiable Instruments Act and mediation law. The Court directed trial courts to refer NI Act cases to mediation immediately after service of the accused, with proceedings resuming if mediation fails.
Read more